Search Results for "Karnataka Civil Services Rules 2006"

768 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 768 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Transport Authority in Motor Vehicles Act Case on Vehicle Replacement Rule. Kerala Motor Vehicle Rule 174(2)(c) Validated as It Does Not Exceed Section 83 and Serves Public Safety by Prohibiting Older Vehicle Replacements.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute concerning the validity of Rule 174(2)(c) of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989, which allows the tra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission’s Distribution Open Access Regulations. Challenge Concerns Alleged Jurisdictional Overreach Curtailing Consumers’ Right to Access Power Exchange Under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The provided text is an incomplete extract of a judgment from the Bombay High Court in a set of writ petitions (WP Nos. 2694/2014, 2318/2014, 2294/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Zone of Consideration for Scheduled Tribes Promotion in Electricity Department — Seniority-Based Zone of Consideration Upheld as Valid Methodology for Promotion from Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by eight petitioners who were working as Junior Engineers in the Electricity Department of the Governme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Application and Appoints Arbitrator in Iron Ore Sale Dispute. The court held that the Section 9 application was within limitation and appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, M/s Shree Mallikarjun Shipping Pvt. Ltd., entered into a contract dated 25.2.2008 with the respondent, M/s Balaji Logistics Carriers, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'HOTEL SPECIAL' vs 'SVT HOTEL SPECIAL' for Asafoetida. Deceptive Similarity Established Despite Addition of Prefix 'SVT'.

The appellant/defendant, S.V.T Products, challenged an interim injunction order passed by the XVIII Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru, in O.S. No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...