Search Results for "Gujarat High Court Rules"

2527 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2527 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals By Appellants. Against State Of Gujarat Ors. -- Holds Construction Equipment Not Motor Vehicles Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Exempts From Registration And Tax Under Gujarat Motor Vehicles Tax Act, 1958

The Supreme Court examined whether various construction equipment used by cement manufacturers within their factory premises constitute 'motor vehicle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Higher-Ranked Candidates in J&K Police Sub-Inspector Recruitment Dispute. Court Holds That Concession by Advocate General Cannot Override Statutory Rules and Right to Equality Under Article 14.

The case involves a long-standing dispute over the recruitment of Sub-Inspectors of Police (Executive) in Jammu and Kashmir pursuant to an advertiseme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Decree for Removal of Unauthorized Construction in Property Dispute. Partition Deed and Commissioner Report Establish Encroachment, Affirming Trial Court's Injunction Under Section 96 CPC.

The case involves a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the defendant (appellant) challenging the judgment an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor under POCSO Act and IPC. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory Sufficient to Sustain Conviction and Death Penalty in Rarest of Rare Case.

The case pertains to the confirmation of the death sentence awarded to Atul Rama Lote by the Special Judge (POCSO), Thane, for the rape and murder of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Tribunal Order Refusing to Treat Company's Closure Application as Withdrawn. Held that the Tribunal's refusal was not perverse and the Union's application was premature under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the General Motors Employees Union challenging an order of the Industrial Tribunal dated 28.04.2023 ...