Search Results for "Civil Procedure Code, 1908"

5125 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5125 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Interest on Delayed Payments Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Payment under Section 19 of Limitation Act, 1963 requires pleading and proof; Section 14 exclusion not available for different entity.

The Supreme Court dismissed three review petitions filed against its common judgment dated 23.01.2019, which had dismissed civil appeals by M/s Shanti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Land Ownership in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Successor Corporation Cannot Reopen Final Orders Under ULC Act After Vesting of Land in State.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition and a second appeal filed by the Sangli Miraj Kupwad Cities Municipal Corporation (successor of Miraj ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Prior Sale as Valid Despite Unregistered Deed. Subsequent Purchaser's Deed Declared Void Ab Initio Due to Notice of Earlier Sale Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The dispute pertains to a portion of land admeasuring 1.70 hectares out of Survey No.13/1 of village Shelavli, Palghar. The plaintiffs (Respondent Nos...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Plaintiff's Title Based on Registered Deed. Registered document prevails over unregistered agreement; possession ordered to be handed over to the plaintiff.

The case involves a dispute over a flat in Pune. The plaintiff, Nanda Madhukar Yene, claimed she purchased the suit flat and obtained a registered Dee...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Modifies Preliminary Decree in Partition Suit, Applies Vineetha Sharma Principles Under Hindu Succession Act. Daughter Entitled to 1/9 Share as Coparcener Under Central Act 39 of 2005, Irrespective of Father's Death Before 2005 and Regardless of Date of Marriage.

The judgment arises from a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the preliminary decree dated 25.02.2016 pas...