ARBITRATION PETITION NO.549 OF 2013
9 Jun 2017...
Search Results for "Alternative Access"
695 result(s) found
Found 695 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Municipal Corporation for Non-Compliance of Land Acquisition Order. Conditional Order Does Not Amount to Willful Disobedience Under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
12 Oct 2017The petitioner, M/s. Chinchwad Devasthan Trust, a public religious trust, owned land admeasuring about 1,05,400 sq.m at Bhosari within the jurisdictio...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Invalid Service of Demand Notice. Notice sent by speed post but not delivered to correct address; court holds that service of notice is mandatory under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
12 Dec 2017The petitioner, Salim s/o Jilani Qureshi, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the C...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Design Infringement and Passing Off Case — Registered Design Owner Granted Protection Against Infringement. Court Confirms That Substantial Similarity to Registered Design Constitutes Infringement Under Section 22 of Designs Act, 2000, and That Interim Relief Is Properly Granted When Prima Facie Case, Balance of Convenience, and Irreparable Loss Are Established.
20 Feb 2018The present appeal was filed by the original defendants (Kalpesh R. Jain, Ravi Raut, and Ketan Panchal) against the order and judgment dated 06.12.201...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Resolution to Demolish and Reconstruct Building — Petitioners Failed to Show Violation of Statutory Provisions or Bye-laws. The court held that the resolution passed by the requisite majority is binding on all members, including dissenting members, and no interference under Article 226 is warranted.
11 Apr 2018The petitioners, who are partners of M/s. Remedios Brothers Brick Manufacturing Co., a partnership firm, filed a writ petition challenging a resolutio...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.
17 Sep 2018The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...
- 113
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Writ Against Ombudsman Award in PMFBY Crop Insurance Dispute. Error in Village Name by Cooperative Society Does Not Shift Liability to Insurer; Ombudsman's Award Upheld.
7 Jan 2025The case involves a dispute under the Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) scheme. The first respondent, a non-loanee farmer, insured her crops th...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Bank Fraud Case Due to Cooperation and No Custodial Interrogation Required. Petitioners Allegedly Induced Bank to Sanction Loans Based on Forged Documents, but Court Found No Need for Custody as Documents Already Seized and Petitioners Cooperated.
22 Oct 2024The petitioners, Rudhir Sareen, Saurav Vinay Jain, and Kamlesh Hari Kochra, filed separate writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ind...
- 101
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Daughter's Maintenance Claim Under Section 125 CrPC Against Father Despite Muslim Personal Law. The court held that Section 125 CrPC overrides personal law and a major unmarried daughter unable to maintain herself is entitled to maintenance from her father.
18 Dec 2014The petitioner, Meharunnisa, an unmarried major Muslim daughter, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC challenging the order of the Fast Track Court...
- 73
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Based on Promise of Marriage — Consent Found Voluntary and Not Vitiated by False Promise. The court held that sexual intercourse on a promise of marriage does not constitute rape if the promise was not false from the inception and the consent was voluntary.
8 Feb 2013The appellant, Mallesh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Raichur, in Sessions Case No.79/2007 for the offence of ...
- 46
