Search Results for "sufficient reasons"

11511 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11511 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)

Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decree Granting Letters of Administration in Will Dispute. Will Proved in Accordance with Law, No Suspicious Circumstances Found Under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case involves a dispute over the estate of E. Srinivasa Pillai, who died on 19th January 1978. The plaintiffs, C. Saradambal (widow of the testato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 3748 OF 2011

The dispute concerns allocation of natural gas from the KG D6 fields in the Krishna-Godavari Basin, where a significant reduction in production occurr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Wife Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as circumstances did not form complete chain pointing to guilt.

The appellant, Ganpat Shetye, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mapusa, for the murder of his wife Sneha under Section 302 IPC and sente...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 306 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or instigation leading to suicide.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of three appellants (husband, father-in-law, and mother-in-law of the deceased) under Sections 306 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — One Time Settlement Not Binding as Bank Did Not Accept Offer. Court Held That Mere Submission of OTS Proposal Does Not Create Binding Contract; Bank's Rejection Valid.

The petitioners, borrowers of the respondent bank, challenged the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bangalore in Diary No...