Search Results for "separate notices"

1862 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1862 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order in Sales Tax Exemption Dispute. Revisional Authority Under Section 57 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Has Power to Set Aside Refund Orders Granted Under Section 62 When Exemption Notification Does Not Apply.

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv Shyam Sales Enterprises, a partnership firm dealing in gas hot plates as importer and retailer, filed a writ petition under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Against Demolition of Tenanted Premises Without Notice. Municipal Corporation Directed to Follow Due Process Under Section 354 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Before Demolishing Structures Occupied by Tenants.

The petitioners, Mrs. Lilly P. Pandit, Mr. Ivan D'Souza, and Mr. Abbas Masalawala, are tenants residing in rooms on the ground floor of 30 Mistry Buil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Central Excise Appeal in Purification Activity Case — Tribunal's Order Set Aside for Judicial Indiscipline. Purification of excise duty paid goods on job work basis does not amount to manufacture under Section 2(f) of Central Excise Act, 1944, and Tribunal bound by precedents.

The Bombay High Court disposed of Central Excise Appeal No.179 of 2014 and Civil Writ Petition No.279 of 2015 by a common order. The appellant, Sunbel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings — Held That Recovery Officer Has Power to Attach Property Under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Zilla Sah Pat Sanstha Ltd. and its Special Recovery Officer, and by Nana Appa Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Cases Involving 100% EOU — Cenvat Credit on Inputs and Capital Goods Allowed Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial compliance with Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Notification No. 22/2003-CE sufficient for entitlement to Cenvat credit.

The judgment concerns three Central Excise Appeals filed by Shri Dharampal Lalchand Chug and Shri Kamal Lalchand Chug, who are sole proprietors of 100...