Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

1317 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1317 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Delay in Issuance of Final Judgment Under Section 6 of Maharashtra Private Forest (Acquisition) Act, 1975 — Directs Collector to Issue Judgment Without Requiring Prior Approval Under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The court held that the Collector's insistence on prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 was erroneous as the lands had already vested under the state acquisition law, and the issuance of the final judgment was a ministerial act.

15 Mar 2022

The petitioners, Sankalp Resorts Private Limited and Emerald Acres Private Limited, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direc...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Suit for Specific Performance Dismissed as Plaintiff Did Not Show Continuous Readiness and Willingness to Perform His Part of Contract Under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

2 Feb 2026

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 16.09.2007, by which the defendant agreed to sell agricultural...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Permanent Disability at Young Age in Motor Accident Claim. The Court held that quantification of non-pecuniary damages requires careful consideration, especially when the claimant suffers permanent disability at a young age under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

11 Jan 2022

The appellant, Basavaraj, aged 21, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injuries sustained in a road ac...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for declaration and possession dismissed as plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

14 Aug 2014

The case involves a property dispute between Mahaboob Bi (appellant) and the legal representatives of Sharfunnisa (respondents). The appellant filed a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Expenditure Tax Act Classification Between Hindu and Mappilla Undivided Families. Differential Treatment of Hindu Undivided Families and Mappilla Families Under Marumakkattayam Law is Not Discriminatory Under Article 14 of Constitution of India, 1950.

26 Feb 1969

The case concerned a challenge under Article 14 of the Constitution to Section 3(1) of the Expenditure-tax Act, 1957. The appellant was the karta of a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Injunction Dispute Over Possession of Properties — Sets Aside Trial Court Order for Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Failure to Record Reasons for Dispensing with Notice Renders Ex Parte Injunction Void.

21 Apr 2025

The appellant, Mr. Srinivas Adhikeshavulu Dalvai, was the defendant in a suit filed by M/s Anushka Constructions Pvt Ltd (the respondent/plaintiff) in...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Nov 2025

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 read with Order XLII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petitioner to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Partition Suit. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory, Not Mandatory — Trial Court's Rejection Quashed on Payment of Costs.

8 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Sri S. Indushekhar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 25/11/202...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Civil Revision Application in Property Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The Court held that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and was not barred by limitation, as the suit was for partition and separate possession based on joint family property.

6 Jul 2023

The judgment arises from a Civil Revision Application filed by the applicants (defendants in the original suit) against the order of the Civil Judge, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Title and Adverse Possession. Court holds that dismissal of restitution application under Section 144(1) CPC does not bar a fresh suit for possession based on independent title.

11 Oct 2018

The case involves a property dispute over a house and land at Survey No. 123, Block No. 276, village Atyal, taluka Gadhinglaj. The respondents (origin...

61 62 63 64 65

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)