Search Results for "insurance offence"

684 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 684 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Medical Negligence Case Due to Lack of Monitoring in Dengue Treatment. Failure to Monitor Hematocrit and Platelet Levels Constitutes Negligence Despite Following Fluid Protocol.

The case pertains to a medical negligence claim arising from the death of Madhu Manglik, the spouse of the appellant Arun Kumar Manglik, who was admit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pensionary Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Upholding Removal Order Due to Delay. Petitioner's challenge to removal dismissed as barred by laches, but court directs payment of pension and gratuity as per rules.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar s/o Devidas Deshmukh, a retired Tax Collector from Amravati Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for 85% Permanent Disability in Motor Accident Claim - Claimant's Right Leg Amputated and Fingers Lost, Tribunal's Award of Rs. 3.5 Lakh Held Inadequate, Enhanced to Rs. 10 Lakh with Interest.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Pandit Kharat, a 31-year-old mason, filed a claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for injuries sustained in a motor acci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bail to Developer in Consumer Execution Proceedings for Non-Compliance of Refund Order. Held that Section 27 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is penal in nature and bail should be granted liberally unless there is likelihood of abscondence or tampering with evidence.

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, a developer, was involved in a consumer dispute with the respondent, Dhanraj Tulshiram Khaparde, who had paid Rs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Appreciation of Evidence. Negligence of Driver Established Through Oral Testimony and Site Inspection Report, Entitling Claimant to Compensation Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Laximan Vithoba Gaunkar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs. 2,00,000...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement and Counter Claim in Suit Filed Before 2002 CPC Amendment. Order 6 Rule 17 as amended by 2002 Amendment Act does not apply to suits instituted before 1.7.2002.

The petitioner, Sumita Pradipkumar Dixit, challenged an order dated 29.8.2009 passed by the trial court in RC Suit No. 187/1999, which rejected her ap...