Search Results for "entertain"

5725 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5725 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Civil Court's Jurisdiction in Saranjam Property Dispute. The court held that the Bombay Rent-Free Estates Act, 1852 and Exemptions from Land Revenue Acts, 1863 do not bar civil court jurisdiction over title and possession of Saranjam properties.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendant no. 1 challenging an order dated 22 February 2005 passed by the Joint C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Order Allowing Settlement Application. Settlement Commission's Finding of Full and True Disclosure of Income by Assessee in Case of Alleged Bogus Purchases Upheld Under Section 245D of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders passed by the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Co-operative Bank Loan Dispute. Court upholds award holding borrowers jointly and severally liable for Rs.9.88 crore with interest under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Abid & Company Steels Private Limited and its directors, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Rejection of Leave to Defend in Summary Suit. Bank Granted Conditional Leave to Defend on Deposit of Rs. 25 Lakhs for Triable Issues Regarding Liability as Mortgagee in Possession Under Order 37 CPC.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by ICICI Bank Limited (the applicant/original defendant No.1) against the order dated 30th June 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Revision Application Under Mamlatdar's Court Act Due to Bona fide Mistake of Lawyer. Petitioner's delay in filing revision before Additional Collector instead of Deputy Collector condoned as sufficient cause under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Mohan Khemlo Bandekar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court at Goa, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Revision Application Under Mamlatdar's Court Act Due to Bona Fide Mistake of Lawyer. Petitioner's Delay in Filing Revision Before Additional Collector Condoned as Lawyer's Erroneous Advice Constitutes Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act.

The petitioner, Mohan Khemlo Bandekar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16/10/2014 passed by the Additional Collector-II, North Goa, r...