Search Results for "endorsement refused"

801 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 801 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Cruelty and Abetment. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of dowry or instigation to commit suicide.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 651 of 1990 filed by the accused (appellants) against their conviction under Sections 498-A and 306...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against Dismissal of Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act for Want of Prosecution — Technical Dismissal Not on Merits. The court held that dismissal under Section 256 CrPC is not a bar to appeal as it is not a decision on merits.

The applicant, Terna Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of ST Candidate for PG Medical Admission Despite Non-Production of Original Certificates. Court Directs Pragmatic Approach and Admission to be Granted Subject to Production of Certificates or Affidavit.

The petitioner, Dr. Ashok Vithal Date, a scheduled tribe candidate, appeared for the common entrance test for medical post graduate courses in Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant-accused, Shivu Chandram Loni, was convicted by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli for the murder of Shakuntala under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Satara, which c...