Search Results for "discovery statement"

1366 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1366 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction Based on Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Fails as Circumstantial Evidence Does Not Form Complete Chain Pointing to Guilt Under Sections 302 and 392 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Radhe Zulidas Mandal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No. 34 of 2012 for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness and Inconsistency with Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was brother of deceased and testimony lacked corroboration.

The appellant, Ganesh Baban Solankar, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad, in Sessions Case No. 71 of 2006 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 328, 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shamshul Yadali Sheikh, was convicted by the IV Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Thane in Sessions Case No.89 of 2004 for the murder of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 364-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Under Section 364-A IPC — Life Sentence Confirmed Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Identification of Victim and Accused.

The case involves three appeals filed by Mohammad Imdar Ali (A-4), Srinivas Gauramkondu (A-2), and Suraj Kumar Jha (A-3) against their conviction and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Based on Dying Declaration and Recovery of Weapon. Oral dying declaration made by deceased to his children immediately after assault held admissible and sufficient to convict under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Prabhakar Ambaji Bhagwat, was convicted by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of Lawrence Christi under Section 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Temple Election Dispute — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Accused No.1 Under Section 302 IPC. Motive and Last Seen Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Despite Acquittal of Co-accused.

The appellant, Uttam Vaiju Majukar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadhinglaj, for the murder of Suresh Annappa Bhogan under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Review Application in Property Suit — No Error Apparent on Record. Review under Section 114 CPC read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is not an appeal; mere disagreement with findings does not warrant review.

The present application was filed by the heirs of deceased Mahendrabhai Lallubhai Patel and others (original petitioners/defendants) under Section 114...