Search Results for "developer permission"

649 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 649 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Contempt Petition Against Newspaper for Fair Reporting of Court Proceedings. Publication of Article About Litigation Between Senior Citizen and Builder Held Not to Constitute Contempt of Court as It Was a Fair and Accurate Report of Pending Proceedings.

The petitioner, Vijay S. Mallya, filed a criminal contempt petition against Bennett Coleman and Company Limited (publisher of The Times of India), its...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Redevelopment of Acquired Property Under MHADA Based on Settlement Between Owners, Tenants, and Builder. Court Holds That Once Acquisition Notification Lapses, Property Can Be Redeveloped by Private Parties with Consent of All Stakeholders.

The petitioners, comprising owners (Petitioners 1 & 2), tenants (Petitioners 3 to 10), and a builder (Petitioner 11), filed a writ petition challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Industrial Park Scheme Benefits. Interpretation of Section 80IA(4)(iii) of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Industrial Park Scheme 2002 requires strict compliance with conditions for deduction.

The petitioners, M/s. Silver Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Competent Authority Order in MOFA Dispute — Failure to Provide Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Section 5A of MOFA Requires Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Directing Conveyance of Land to Society.

The petitioners, Mazda Construction Company, Maredia Enterprises, and Sultanabad CHS Ltd. (Proposed), challenged an order dated 11.04.2012 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Development Dispute — No Valid Arbitration Agreement Exists as Alleged Agreement Was Never Finalized or Executed by Both Parties.

The applicant, G.A. Builders Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Eviction Order in Slum Rehabilitation Case. Court upholds MHADA's jurisdiction to evict unauthorized occupants from transit accommodation under Section 3M of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by 16 individuals who were occupants of transit accommodation in a building known as 'Sukh Sadan' in Go...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in Criminal Trespass Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case — Complaint Fails to Disclose Essential Ingredients of Section 447 IPC Read with Section 34 IPC

The petitioners, accused nos. 1 and 2 in C.C. No. 13911/SS/2009 pending before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 65th Court at Andheri, filed a criminal wr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to MOFA Amendments and Upholds Conveyance Order — Amendments to Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963 by Act No.4 of 2008 are intra vires and Competent Authority's order directing conveyance is valid as promoter failed to execute conveyance within statutory period.

The petitioner, M/s. Shree Siddharth Construction, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Maharashtra Ow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Frame Preliminary Issue in Rent Act Proceedings. Maintainability of Application Under Section 13A(2) of Bombay Rents Act Involves Mixed Questions of Law and Fact and Cannot Be Decided as Preliminary Issue.

The case involves two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 7th October 2004 passed by the competent authori...