Search Results for "contradictory statement"

1621 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1621 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Manoj @ Manya Pandurang Kadam, Pranay @ Pintya Ramesh Pawar, and Pradeep @ Dadya Atmaram Pawar, were convicted by the Additional Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 201, 324, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 6, were convicted by the Ist Ad hoc Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, on 8.5.2007 in Sessions Case No.102 of 2006...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole dying declaration was not recorded in proper question-answer form and lacked corroboration.

The appellants, four individuals, were convicted by the 3rd Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the murder of Mohammad Rafiq under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence or independent witnesses.

The appellant, Vishnu Hari Khopkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, for the murder of his wife Aruna under Section 302 IPC and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations — Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Were Contradictory and Not Free from Doubt.

The appellant, Sunil s/o Deorao Dhawale, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, for the murder of his wife Rajani under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Accused's Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, Examining Credibility of Dying Declaration. Court Analyzes Whether Dying Declaration Sufficient to Convict When Sole Eyewitness Hostile.

This criminal appeal arose from the conviction of Bapu (Nandu) Prabhu Koli @ Raut under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code by the Sessions Court, Os...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder Under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC. The Court Assessed the Evidence of a Sole Interested Eye-Witness and the Effect of Hostile Witnesses.

The two criminal appeals arise from Sessions Case No. 234 of 2008, wherein the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune convicted six accused persons for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Landlord's Challenge to MRT Order Granting Tenant Declaration Under Bombay Tenancy Act. Dispute Involves Agricultural Land Where MRT Overturned Concurrent Findings, Applying Deemed Tenancy Under Section 4 and Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The matter arose from a tenancy application filed by the respondent under Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under NDPS Act for Heroin Possession at Airport. Conviction Based on Recovery of 6.4 kg Heroin Concealed in Television Picture Tube and Statements Under Section 67 of the NDPS Act.

The appellant, a Nigerian national, was convicted by the Special Judge under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Testamentary Suit for Letters of Administration; Will Not Validly Executed Due to Suspicious Circumstances and Undue Influence. Holograph Will Dated 20 March 1980 Not Proved Under Section 69 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872; Propounder Failed to Remove Suspicious Circumstances.

The testamentary suit originated from a petition filed by the son of the deceased seeking Letters of Administration with the Will dated 20 March 1980....