Search Results for "body corporate"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "body corporate"

1200 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1200 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order Allowing Settlement Application. Settlement Commission's prima facie satisfaction under Section 245D(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding true and full disclosure cannot be challenged by Revenue at the stage of allowing the application.

4 Apr 2019

The Income Tax Department filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 30.5.2017 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission under Section 245D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Sessions Court's Dismissal of Revision Application on Jurisdictional Grounds — Held That Revision Application Cannot Be Dismissed in Limine on Point of Jurisdiction Without Hearing on Merits.

31 Jul 2019

The petitioners filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11.7.2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Jud...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retrospective Demand of Market Fee and DPC Under Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Market Committee Cannot Levy Fee on Transactions Prior to Notification of Market Area Under Sections 26 and 27 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

29 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Arasa Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Notices Against Directors in Central Excise Case — No Personal Liability Without Specific Statutory Provision. Directors of a company cannot be treated as assessees or deemed to be in default for excise duty demands under the Central Excise Act, 1944, in the absence of a provision akin to Section 179 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioners, Sunil Parmeshwar Mittal and Kirti Trambaklal Shah, were directors of a company that was assessed for excise duty. The Deputy Commissi...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.5186 OF 2001

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Kotak Mahindra Bank Seeking Priority Over Secured Creditors in Liquidation Proceeds of Hukumchand Mills Ltd. The Court held that the Official Liquidator's decision to distribute sale proceeds among secured creditors in accordance with Section 529A of the Companies Act, 1956 was correct and that the petitioner, as an unsecured creditor, was not entitled to priority.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Official Liquidator of Hukumchand Mills Ltd. to dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints for Dishonour of Cheques Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court held that the complainant must prove that the demand notice was sent to the correct address of the accused by registered post with acknowledgment due, failing which the complaint is not maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves a batch of criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioners (Prabhakar Dattatraya Gune, Sanjay Chandrakant Kirloskar, and M.V. P...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Executing Court's Order Directing Bank to Deposit Amount in Execution Proceedings — Review Dismissed. Bank's Challenge Under Article 227 Fails as Executing Court's Order Was Within Jurisdiction and Not Contrary to Law.

18 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Dena Bank, was the defendant no.2 in Special Civil Suit No.100/2007 filed by the respondent no.1 (since deceased, represented by legal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Impleadment of Shareholders in Patent Ownership Suit — Applicants Holding 6.3% Shares Have Sufficient Interest in Subject Matter of Suit. Shareholders are proper parties under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC when the suit concerns company assets that affect share value.

12 Mar 2014

The applicants, Percy Rutton Kavasmaneck and Aban Percy Kavasmaneck, filed a Chamber Summons seeking impleadment as party defendants in Suit No. 2932 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Sundeep Polymers Due to Bona Fide Dispute Over Hire Purchase Agreement. Dispute Regarding Defective Vehicle and Pending Consumer Complaint Constitutes Substantial Grounds, Not a Mere Debt Acknowledgment.

1 Apr 2014

The petitioning-creditor, Tata Motors Ltd (formerly Tata Finance Ltd), filed a winding-up petition under sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 19...

61 62 63 64 65

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)