Search Results for "Distinct offences"

1209 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1209 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Police Cannot Seize Immovable Property Under Section 102 CrPC. The expression 'any property' in Section 102(1) CrPC means only movable property, and immovable property cannot be seized by police during investigation.

The Supreme Court in this judgment resolved a long-standing conflict of opinion in the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 102 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 430 OF 2025

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, who are family members, filed three writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Triple Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Establish Guilt. Accused Raju Birha Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Three Persons, Death Penalty Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

The case pertains to the conviction of Raju Birha for the murder of three persons, Sunil Kotangale, Kailash Bahadure, and Golu @ Ashish Gaikwad, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Engineers in SC/ST Act Case for Lack of Intent to Humiliate. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Meeting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, Prashant Patil and Mohan Gavit, were Assistant Junior Engineer and Sectional Engineer respectively at Panchayat Samiti, Sakri. Respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Inconsistent with Medical Report and Circumstances.

The appellant, Rattan Suka Lilke, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik, for offences under Section 366 read with Section 34 IPC and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Five Accused in Murder Case Arising from Canal Dispute. The court affirmed life imprisonment under Section 302 read with 149 IPC for causing death during an unlawful assembly with common object of damaging property.

The case arises from an incident on 07/02/2004 at about 10:00 PM when the deceased and prosecution witnesses went to their field for watering crops. T...