Search Results for "Article 225"

731 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 731 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Instigation or Active Participation. Mere harassment or cruelty without direct instigation does not constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.

The judgment concerns two criminal petitions for bail and a writ petition filed by the petitioners, E S Praveen Kumar and Eediga Srikanth, who were ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Reinstatement Without Back Wages for Daily Wage Workers in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Daily Wage Sweepers by Municipal Corporation Held Illegal Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but Back Wages Denied for Lack of Proof of Unemployment.

The petitioners, four daily wage sweepers (Safai Kamdars), were initially employed by the erstwhile Joshipura Nagarpalika in 1999. Upon merger of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order for Possession Under Order XXI Rule 95 CPC — Auction Purchaser Entitled to Delivery of Property from Judgment Debtors After Confirmation of Sale.

The applicants, original judgment debtors, filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging an o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Reverses Acquittal for Dishonour of Cheque. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused; failure to lead evidence or cross-examine complainant results in conviction.

The appellant, Sathisha B.A., filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Director Convicted for Electricity Theft — Acquittal Restored Due to Lack of Evidence of Personal Involvement. Vicarious liability under Sections 39 and 44 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 cannot be imposed without proof of direct participation or knowledge of tampering.

The appellant, Mahaveer, was a director of M/s Rushi Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd., a company in Jalana, Maharashtra. The Maharashtra State Electricity ...