Search Results for "Article 16(2)"

967 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 967 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Interest on Seized Amount Returned Without Interest Under FERA. Court holds that interest is payable on amounts seized and retained by the Enforcement Directorate when ultimately returned to the owner, applying principles of restitution and equity.

The petitioners, M/s R.K. Jewellers (a partnership firm) and M/s N.B. Exports (a proprietary concern), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Failure to Prove Unlawful Assembly. Conviction Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 323, 427, 452 Read With Section 149 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declaration and Witness Testimony Found Unreliable.

The case arises from a political rivalry in Aundi village, Solapur district. The appellants, along with others, were tried for forming an unlawful ass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Wasudeo s/o Madhukar Khadatkar, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Naresh Mankar under Section 302 of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Expressway Land Acquisition Compensation Process; Dismisses Farmers’ Writ Petitions

The petitions were filed by farmers whose lands were acquired for the Jalna–Nanded Super Express Highway project. The landowners challenged the ...