Search Results for "separate notices"

1865 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1865 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Document Furnishing in Co-operative Society Election Dispute. Petitioners failed to demonstrate any legal right or duty to compel production of documents under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959.

The petitioners, Kondavadi Milk Producers Co-operative Society Ltd. and its President K. Chandrashekar, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeal in Revenue Recovery Dispute Against Company in Liquidation. Priority of secured creditor's claim under Section 529A of Companies Act, 1956 upheld over State's statutory dues under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The case involves an appeal by the State of Karnataka and its officers against an order of the Company Judge dated 03.11.1998 in Company Application N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging School Tribunal Orders in Seniority and Appointment Dispute. Court Holds That Appointment of Head Mistress Was Valid and Seniority Must Be Determined by Education Inspector.

The judgment involves two writ petitions. Writ Petition No. 683 of 2002 was filed by Mrs. Pushpa Surendra Dhaktode challenging the School Tribunal's o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Exemption Under Notification No.119/75 for Job Work — Goods Manufactured on Job Work Basis Eligible for Duty Exemption on Job Charges

The Petitioner, M/s Godrej Soap Ltd., filed a Writ Petition challenging an order dated 23.3.1989 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission's Power to Levy Interest Under Section 234B When No Interest Was Charged in Original Assessment. Interest under Section 234B(4) can only be increased or reduced if it was initially chargeable under the original assessment order.

The petitioner, Akbar Travels of India Pvt. Ltd., an IATA approved travel agent and money changer, filed returns for Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2006-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Nominations to Standing Committee of Akola Municipal Corporation for Violation of Natural Justice. State Government's Order under Section 451 of Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioners, Suresh Jagannath Patil (Mayor), Sunil Tukaram Meshram (Corporator), and Surprakash Shrawan Shirsat (Corporator) of Akola Municipal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. The court held that failure to consider the detenu's retraction of confession and non-supply of the retraction letter violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Anju Madan Lalwani, wife of Madan Vishindas Lalwani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the deten...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Withdrawal of Approval for Engineering College Due to Unauthorized Relocation. AICTE's order upheld as petitioners shifted college without prior approval, violating statutory requirements under AICTE Act and University affiliation norms.

The petitioners, Parshvanath Charitable Trust and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 7 Jan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Condonation of Delay and Setting Aside Abatement in Second Appeal Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Sufficient Cause. Legal heirs failed to explain delay of over 5 years in seeking restoration of appeal after appellant's death.

The present litigation arises from a second appeal filed in 1994 which was disposed of as abated on 20.07.2012 due to the death of the sole appellant ...