Search Results for "promotion affected"

736 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 736 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Duty Exemption Withdrawal Case — Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Cannot Bar Withdrawal of Exemption in Public Interest. Public Interest Overrides Individual Interest When Withdrawal of Tax Exemption Is Based on Health Hazards.

The Supreme Court of India heard three civil appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Sikkim High Court and the Gauhati High Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Single Judge's Decision on CCC Certificate Requirement for Technician Grade-II Recruitment. Court holds that only CCC certificates issued or recognized by DOEACC/NIELIT are valid, and equivalence cannot be determined by the Commission without statutory backing.

The Supreme Court considered three appeals against a Division Bench judgment of the Allahabad High Court that had set aside a Single Judge's order reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Employees' Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. Held that aided non-government educational institutions are bound to adopt government pension scheme for employees who retired after the cut-off date.

The petitioners, thirteen retired employees of Dr. Punjabrao Deshmukh Polytechnic, Amravati (respondent No.4), which is run by Shivaji Education Socie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Industrial Dispute — Petitioner Company Failed to Show Perversity or Jurisdictional Error in Awards Granting Relief to Workmen.

The petitioner, Electropneumatics And Hydraulics India Pvt. Ltd., filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging separate ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Acquisition Notification for Petitioners' Land Due to Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971. Notification held invalid for failing to specify the particular land and for not providing opportunity of hearing before declaration of slum area.

The petitioners, Yogesh Chandulal Mehta and Suresh Chandulal Mehta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Premium and Interest Demands for Leasehold Land Conversion in Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's demand for premium and interest under Development Charges Rules and lease terms upheld as valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioners, Shelton Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, Neelkanth Infratech Co., and M/s. Juhi Habitat Pvt. Ltd., were lessees of plots in Navi Mumbai under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Restraining Transfer of Employees in Print Media Company. Transfer of Senior Printers to Other Locations Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 9 and 10 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, The Indian Express (P) Limited and its two officers, challenged an order dated 28 November 2022 passed by the learned Member, Industr...