LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.288 OF 1999
28 Apr 2005...
Search Results for "prior award"
3935 result(s) found
Found 3935 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal's Award Enhancing Retirement Age from 58 to 60 Years for Clerical Staff. Model Standing Order 25 under Bombay Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Rules, 1959 Recognizes 60 Years as Appropriate Retirement Age for Clerical and Supervisory Staff.
30 Mar 2005The case involves a challenge by Madura Coats Limited (the management) against an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 17th April 2003, which enhanc...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Dispute — Arbitrator's Findings on Breach of Contract and Damages Upheld Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the arbitrator's decision was based on evidence and within the contract terms, and no interference was warranted.
21 Jan 2014The petitioner, M/s. BhavaniCotex, a proprietary firm engaged in the cotton business, challenged an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration...
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Single Judge's Order Partially Setting Aside Arbitral Award. The Court affirmed reduction of interest rate from 18% to 12% per annum and setting aside of claim nos. (d) and (g) and interest on security deposit.
14 Mar 2016The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL) against a judg...
- 93
High Court
Gujarat High Court Partly Allows ONGC's Appeals in Land Acquisition Cases — Compensation Reduced from Rs. 120 to Rs. 80 per sq.m. Due to Improper Deduction for Development Charges and Reliance on Non-Comparable Sale Instances. The Court held that the Reference Court erred in determining market value without proper deduction and by relying on a small plot sale, which is not comparable to large agricultural lands under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
19 Jan 2026The case involves a batch of first appeals filed by Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC) against the judgment and award of the Reference Court in...
- 131
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Petitioners Failed to Show Prejudice from Entry Made During Consolidation Proceedings. Mutation entries do not confer title; proper remedy is civil suit under Article 226 of Constitution.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, a group of individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) c...
- 75
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Executing Court Order in Arbitration Award Execution — Stamp Duty Payable Under Article 5(c) Not Article 11(b) of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957. Arbitral award directing sale of property is a certificate of sale, not a bond, for stamp duty purposes.
10 Jul 2015The petitioner, Sri Dilli Babu, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 23/8/2014 pas...
- 97
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals in Motor Accident Claims Challenging Tribunal's Absolution of Insurer and Inadequate Compensation. Claimants Argue That Insurer Failed to Prove Driving Licence Breach and Must Pay Under 'Pay and Recover' Principle of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
20 Dec 2013The appeals arose from a motor vehicle accident on 30.06.2009 where a husband and wife on a motorcycle were hit by a rashly driven Light Goods Vehicle...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Broadcast Rights Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 4.77 Crore with Interest. Arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages were not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
31 Aug 2012The Petitioner, Maharashtra Film Stage and Cultural Development Corporation Ltd., a Government of Maharashtra corporation, challenged an Arbitral Awar...
- 104
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Petitioner in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession. Acquisition Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Neither Compensation Paid Nor Possession Taken Before New Act Came Into Force.
9 Jun 2017The petitioner, Sudheer Prabhakar Desai, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of his land bearing Survey No. 112/0 in Village Morjim, Per...
- 52
