Search Results for "expert witness"

1413 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1413 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under IPC — Conviction Under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(f) Challenged

This appeal arises from the conviction of the appellant by the Additional Sessions Judge for offences under Sections 363, 366A and 376(2)(f) of the In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Confirmation Case and Appeals arising from Conviction and Death Sentence in Triple Murder Case. The case involves the killing of three sweepers on suspicion of inter-caste relationship, with accused convicted under Sections 302, 120B, and 201 IPC.

The case involved a triple murder that occurred on 1 January 2013 at Darandale Vasti, Ganeshwadi, in Ahmednagar district. Three sweepers employed at T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for strangulating his wife due to suspicion of infidelity, with evidence of last seen together, unnatural conduct, and medical evidence confirming homicidal death.

The appellant, Kailas @ Kalyan Badrinath Pawar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 01-04-2016 in Sessions Case No.5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Parricide Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Recovery of Weapon. Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji Shankara Zagade, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Satara on 30th September 2000 for the murder of his father...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder and Robbery of a Neuro Surgeon in His Residence — Life Imprisonment Maintained Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory.

The appellants, Kailash Upendra Giri and Damodar Laxmidhar Sahu, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Was Inconsistent and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Rape Allegation.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No. 69 of 2008 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli. The appellant in Crimi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Application for Production of Document in Criminal Complaint. Court holds that the document sought was not relevant to the proceedings and the application was filed belatedly.

The petitioner, Manjula Ramlal Barot, filed a criminal complaint against respondents No.1 to 5 for offences under Sections 347, 348, 386, 395, 506(ii)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favour of Assignee Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Assignment of Contractual Rights and Arbitration Agreement Valid Under Sudanese Law; Respondent's Public Policy Challenge Rejected.

The petitioner, Neilan International Co Ltd, a Sudanese company, sought enforcement of a foreign arbitral award dated 27 September 2018 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Penalty for Three Accused in Kidnap, Gang Rape, and Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and DNA Linkage Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by three convicts challenging the common judgment of the Delhi High Court which affirmed their conviction and deat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Burden of Proof Not Discharged. Appellant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as evidence of comparable sales was not properly established.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Benjamin Pereira against the judgment and award dated 17th November 2006 passed by the Learned District Judge,...