Search Results for "doubtful recovery"

1276 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1276 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Weak Evidence. Bail was allowed as appellants were in custody for over four years without charges framed, and evidence under Sections 120B and 302 IPC and UAPA provisions was insufficient to deny bail.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by two accused persons, identified as accused nos. 46 and 47, who were charged with offences under the Unlawful...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Bhatu Shinde (Patil), was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Dhule, for the murder of Sunil Lakade under Sections 302 and 201 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Intent. Conviction under Sections 307, 324, 506 IPC Set Aside as Injuries Were Simple and Not Caused by Dangerous Weapons.

The case pertains to an incident on 28 June 2014 where the informant, Ramesh Shankarrao Thakre, alleged that the appellants, Kiran Arjunsingh Rathod, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Weak Testimony.

The appellant, Vinod Wasudeo Balpande, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.208/2013 for the murder of Shankarr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Brother's Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 506(II) IPC and Arms Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dilip Madhukar Jadhav, was convicted by the 2nd Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge at Kalyan for the murder of his brother Ravindra Jadha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Six Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Failure to Record Reasons for Search and Lack of Independent Witnesses Renders Recovery of Contraband Illegal.

The case involves six appellants who were convicted by the trial court under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismissed the appeals of Appellants in Murder Case -- High Court Convicted Under IPC Sections 302, 34, 148, 341 Reversed and Acquittal , Justification in conviction

The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals challenging the High Court's judgment that convicted the appellants for murder, reversing the Sessions Court'...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...