Search Results for "builders/developers"

672 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 672 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Bye-Law Amendment for Non-Compliance with Section 22 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Amendment to Bye-Law 26(c) set aside as notice of meeting did not contain proposed amendment.

The petitioner, Sadguru University CHS Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the amendment to Bye-Law 26(c) of the respondent society, Sadguru Premi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance Under MOFA Act — Society Entitled to Conveyance of Both Plots. District Registrar's Order Under Section 11 of MOFA Act, 1963 Upheld as Developer Failed to Show Jurisdictional Error.

The petitioners, M/s. Sawant Constructions, a partnership firm and developer, challenged an order dated 21 June 2013 passed by the District Deputy Reg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Refusal of Redevelopment Permission in CRZ Areas Due to Minimum Plot Size Requirement. Court Upholds MCGM's Decision That Development Control Regulations Do Not Permit Relaxation of Minimum Plot Size for Redevelopment in Coastal Regulation Zone.

The petitioners, including the Maharashtra Chamber of Housing Industries and various real estate companies, filed writ petitions challenging the refus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Property Dispute Over Access and Possession of Suit Plot. Court finds no prima facie case for exclusive possession or title in favour of plaintiff society of flat purchasers.

The plaintiffs, a proposed co-operative society of flat purchasers in Girnar Tower, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendants, incl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit. Amendment to Clarify Property Description Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as No Prejudice Caused to Tenant.

The petitioner, M/s K.T. Kubal & Company, was a tenant in a building owned by the respondent, Mujibur Rehman Haji Israr Alam Siddiqui. The respondent ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Defence of Blank Cheque Given as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (complainant) against the petitioner (accused) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...