Search Results for "Settlement Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Settlement Officer"

2561 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2561 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — Asset Reconstruction Company's Appeal Against Auction Sale Set Aside Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation. The Court upheld the DRAT order dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation and on merits, confirming the auction sale in favour of the respondent.

11 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd., an asset reconstruction company registered under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order for Reinstatement of Workmen in Industrial Dispute — Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment of Service and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Illegal. The court held that the burden to prove abandonment lies on the employer and that termination without notice or compensation under Section 25F is void.

20 Dec 2013

The judgment arises from two writ petitions: Writ Petition No.248 of 2011 filed by Kamala Mills Limited challenging the order of the 1st Labour Court,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compounding of Section 279 IPC Offence Where Accused is Sole Injured Person. The court quashed criminal proceedings under Section 482 CrPC, holding that the offence under Section 279 IPC is compoundable when the accused is the only injured person, applying the principle of mutatis mutandis from Section 338 IPC.

20 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Vishal Agarwal, was driving a Zen car on 7 January 2010 at Agacaim, Goa. Due to his rash driving, he dashed a mini bus on its front si...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Bank Forfeiture — Directs Refund of Rs.24.10 Lakhs Deposit with Interest. Forfeiture of deposit without contractual authority in auction sale is arbitrary and unjust, warranting refund with interest at 6% per annum.

20 Apr 2022

The petitioner, P Balaji Babu, participated in an auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent No.1) for the sale of immovable property ow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Validity of Rule 86E of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, 1961 in Recovery Proceedings. Court Holds That Rule 86E Is Not Ultra Vires Article 14 as Proceedings Under Section 101 Are Summary and Do Not Require Cross-Examination, and Alternative Remedy Under Section 154 Is Available.

9 Dec 2011

The two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 86E of the Maharas...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in U.P. Excise Act Interest Dispute, Holding Licensee Liable for Interest Despite Interim Stay. Interest on Arrears of Excise Revenue is Payable Under Section 38A of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, as Interim Stay Only Suspended Recovery Without Nullifying Statutory Obligation.

25 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from the respondent's license for retail sale of country liquor in Uttar Pradesh for the year 2002-03. The respondent applied for su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 14 Petitions to Terminate Arbitrator Mandate Due to Deemed Waiver of Right to Object. Arbitrator appointed by Co-operative Bank under MSCS Act failed to disclose interest and continued proceedings despite jurisdictional challenge, leading to termination of mandate.

9 Jan 2023

The petitioners, Kalpesh Shantikumar Mehta and others, along with KSM Multitrade LLP and others, filed two petitions under Section 14 of the Arbitrati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Lok Adalat Compromise in Domestic Violence Case — No Fraud Established Against Settlement Reached Under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

6 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Satish Baburao Yadav, challenged an order dated 08.12.2018 passed by the Panel of Lok Adalat in P.W.D.V.A. (Cri.M.A.) No. 62/2018, whi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Denying Locus Standi to Employees in Reference Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Individual Workmen Have No Independent Right to Prosecute Reference but Industrial Court Must Exercise Discretion to Hear Them if Interests Affected.

6 Nov 2006

The petitioners, employees of Empress Mills Retail Sales Division, challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 16th October 1995 which held that...

60 61 62 63 64

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)