Search Results for "Settlement"

5229 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5229 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Application to Reject Suit Due to Arbitration Clause in Commercial Summary Suit. Dispute Referred to Arbitration Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Plaintiff, M/s Railsys Engineers Private Ltd., filed a commercial summary suit against the Defendants, Overseas Infrastructure Alliance Pvt. Ltd. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Clarification in Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 — Circular No.21/2020 Held Ultra Vires. The clarification requiring withdrawal of appeal as a condition for filing declaration under the Act was struck down as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Macrotech Developers Limited, a public limited company engaged in real estate, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging a c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act Based on Lok Adalat Award. Lok Adalat Award Not an Award of Court Under Part III of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners' land was acquired by the State for a storage lake along with other lands. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MACT Award Due to Lack of Proper Representation in Lok Adalat Settlement — Matter Remanded for Fresh Adjudication. Insurance Company Not Duly Represented at Settlement Before Lok Nyayalaya, Rendering the Award Invalid Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The New India Assurance Company Limited filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and order dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Seeking Pay Scales as per Government Notification. Industrial Court's finding that the Government Notification dated 27.07.1989 was not applicable to the complainants and that the settlement at Exh. 48 governed their pay scales was upheld.

The petitioner, a trade union of non-teaching employees of Ramdeobaba Kamla Nehru Engineering College, filed a complaint under the MRTU & PULP Act all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitration Award in Property Division Dispute. Power of Attorney Appointing Panchas Held to Be Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a decision of a Learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Amicable Settlement. Court sets aside Sessions Court order and Magistrate's conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 after complainant accepts full settlement amount.

The applicant, C. Venkatachalapathy, was convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 44th Court, Andheri, Mumbai in C.C.No.4400371/SS/2012 for an offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case Following Settlement. Parties resolved dispute under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, leading to quashing of trial court and revisional court orders.

The petitioner, Lalita Kamal Vyas, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 7th March 2018 passed by the...