Search Results for "Section 148 Income Tax Act"

755 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 755 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Accused in Cooperative Society Forgery Case Where Nominee Not a Court Under Section 195 CrPC. Conviction Upheld as No Sanction Required from Registrar since Offences Under Sections 465 and 471 IPC Not Governed by Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The appeal arose from a criminal complaint filed under Sections 465 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code alleging forgery of a minutes book of a cooperati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Issued to Dead Person Under Income Tax Act — Notice Issued After Death Without Substituting Legal Heir Is Null and Void. Notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued in the name of a deceased assessee is invalid and cannot be cured.

The petitioner, Raniben Khimji Patel, is the legal heir of Khimji Karamshi Patel who died on 2nd March 2021. The Income Tax Department issued a notice...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka adjudicates criminal appeals arising from conviction of a bank employee and relative for conspiracy, forgery, and corruption. Convictions under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 were challenged before the High Court.

The appeals arose out of the judgment dated 26.12.2009 passed by the Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore in Spl.C.C.No.29/2004, whereby the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Allowability of Deduction and Depreciation Rate is Invalid.

The petitioner, Aventis Pharma Ltd., challenged a notice dated 16th March 2009 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by BMTC in Motor Accident Claim, Reduces Compensation Due to Multiplier Error. Tribunal's Use of Multiplier '18' for Deceased Aged 30 Years Held Incorrect; Proper Multiplier is '17' Under Sarla Verma Guidelines.

The appellant, Managing Director of Motor Claims Hub, BMTC, challenged the judgment and award dated 01.01.2022 passed by the XIV Additional Small Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Full and True Disclosure — Share Premium Valuation Dispute Not a Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, The Suminter Organic and Fair Trade Cotton Ginning Mill Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ...