Search Results for "Major penalty"

963 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 963 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Defence of Blank Cheque Given as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (complainant) against the petitioner (accused) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Paternal Grandmother in Guardianship Dispute Over Minor Child — Welfare of Child Paramount. Custody granted to paternal grandmother as maternal grandmother failed to prove her as a fit guardian under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.

The case involves a dispute between the paternal grandmother (appellant) and the maternal grandmother (respondent) over the guardianship of a minor gi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Arms Act and IPC in 1993 Bombay Serial Blasts Case. Appellants Challenged Conviction for Possession of Prohibited Arms Without License and Destruction of Evidence.

The Supreme Court heard appeals against the conviction and sentence of Sanjay Dutt (A-117), Yusuf Mohsin Nulwalla (A-118), and Kersi Bapuji Adajania (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Forest Development Tax Notification. Petitioners Alleged Notification Ultra Vires Article 246 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, Seeking to Quash Demand Notices.

A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, corporations, and individuals, including National ...