Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1878 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1878 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Show Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) challenging the concurrent judgment and decree passed in Special Civil Sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Consent Terms. Consent Terms Recorded in Earlier Suit Are Binding and Cannot Be Reopened Without Proof of Fraud or Collusion Under Order 23 Rule 3 of CPC.

The appellant, Mrs. Geeta Patkar, filed First Appeal No. 18 of 2014 against the judgment and order of the trial court in Special Civil Suit No. 55 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Show Cause Notice in GST Case for Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Show Cause Notice Issued by Additional Commissioner Without Proper Authorization and Without Providing Relevant Documents Set Aside.

The petitioner, M/s. Vigneshwara Transport Company, a proprietor engaged in transportation of goods and registered under the Central Goods and Service...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance of Contract in Property Sale Dispute. Suit for specific performance of agreement to sell house decreed as plaintiff proved readiness and willingness to perform her part of contract.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by original defendant No. 2, Venunath Sambha More, cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Copyright Infringement Case for Technical Drawings of Flash Lights. Court holds that copyright subsists in technical drawings under Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957, and that reproduction in a three-dimensional form constitutes infringement.

The plaintiff, Photoquip India Limited, filed a copyright infringement suit against Delhi Photo Store and Sunlight Industries, alleging that the defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Remands Case for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Limitation and Adverse Possession. The court held that the suit for partition is governed by Article 110 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a partition suit filed by Pandurang Sitaram Pande (original plaintiff) against his brothers and other family members for a 1/5th sha...