Search Results for "IPC Section 376"

1222 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1222 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(g) IPC and SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves three appeals against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai, in Sessions Case No.50/2012. The appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Consent-Based Sexual Relationship Not Rape Under Section 375 IPC as Promise of Marriage Was Not False from Inception.

The appellant, Amit Shende, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Penetrative Sexual Assault Allegation Fails as Victim's Statements to Doctor and Magistrate Did Not Mention Digital Penetration, and Material Evidence Like Knickers Was Not Produced.

The appellant, Chatur @ Chetan Maroti Meshram, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for offences under Section 376-AB IPC and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed FIR. Conviction under Sections 376, 451, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Martand Ramchandra Lohkare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for offences under Sections 376 (rape), 451 (house-tre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Age Discrepancy. Conviction under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), 5(l) of POCSO Act and Sections 376, 417 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's age not proven beyond reasonable doubt and relationship was consensual.

The appellant, Kundan Pendor, was convicted by the trial court under Sections 3(a), 5(j)(ii), and 5(l) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Fails to Prove Forcible Intercourse Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Bandu s/o Maroti Dupare, was convicted by the 3rd District Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Cheating and Forgery Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Dispute over property sale agreement held to be purely civil, not criminal, under Sections 420, 456, 466, 468, 471, 120B of IPC.

The petitioners, family members of Late Thimmarayappa, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution read with Section 482 CrPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Stepfather in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Excluding Paternity — Scientific Evidence Overrides Circumstantial and Testimonial Weaknesses in Rape Conviction Under Sections 376(2)(f),(i),(j) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Govind alias Hemrab s/o Mahadeo Deolkar/Deulkar, was convicted by the learned Designated Judge, POCSO Act and Additional Sessions Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Sentence in Rape Case Due to Consensual Nature and Acquittal of Co-Accused. Appellant convicted under Section 376 IPC for rape of a minor, but sentence reduced from ten to seven years considering consensual intercourse and acquittal of co-accused.

The appellant, Balam @ Ankush Anil Chavan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for an offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal ...