Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1625 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1625 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST Paid on Exported Goods Despite Claim of Higher Drawback Rate. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST under Section 16(3)(b) of IGST Act read with Section 54 of CGST Act and Rule 96 of CGST Rules, as selection of higher drawback column does not disentitle refund.

The petitioner, Kunal Housewares Private Limited, exported stainless steel household articles in July, August, and September 2017. The petitioner paid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Competing Kerosene Dealer for Lack of Locus Standi. Mere Competitor Not a Person Aggrieved Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The appellant, Rajendra Agrawal, a semi-wholesale kerosene dealer in Murtizapur, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of a Single Judge dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Customs Duty Priority Dispute. Customs duty under Section 150(2)(c) of Customs Act, 1962 has priority over warehouse charges under Section 150(2)(d) in distribution of sale proceeds of warehoused goods.

The case involves a dispute between the Union of India (appellant) and M/s. Associated Container Terminal Ltd. (respondent) regarding the priority of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Confiscation Case — Goods Not Liable for Confiscation Under Section 111(d) or 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962. Supplier's Innocent Involvement and Lack of Misdeclaration by Respondent Lead to Dismissal.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Bids in Tender Process for Supply of Medical Equipment. Court upholds rejection of bids as non-responsive for not meeting essential condition of being Original Equipment Manufacturer or authorized representative.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, filed two writ petitions challenging the rejection of their bids by the State of Maharashtra and the Project ...