Search Results for "1894"

1762 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1762 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030005792015_1

The judgment relates to a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections arising out of land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Karnata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Challenging Compensation Awards in Land Acquisition Matters. The Court Determined Market Value of Lands Acquired for a Minor Irrigation Tank in Kakhandaki Village, Bijapur District.

In the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Challenge to Land Acquisition Under BDA Act; Scheme for BTM Layout Allegedly Lapsed. Petitioners Sought Declaration That Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 27 of Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 Due to Failure to Substantially Implement Scheme.

The writ petition was filed before the Karnataka High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by land owners whose property was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Fair Compensation in Appeal Against Enhanced Award Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Cross-Objections Seeking Higher Rate Considered Alongside State's Challenge to Reference Court's Award of Rs.1,500 per sq.m.

The State of Maharashtra acquired land in Village Padghe, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad, for the New Bombay Project under the Land Acquisition Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough Applications; Condition to Stay Outside Home District Held Illegal. Condition That Prisoner Must Not Enter District Where Family Resides Defeats Object of Furlough Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with two criminal writ petitions filed by convicted prisoners challenging the rejection of their furlough...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 28-A Award Due to Non-Joinder of Acquiring Body; Remits for Fresh Hearing. Acquiring Body Held Necessary Party in Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 28-A Proceedings; Award Passed Without It Violates Natural Justice and Is Set Aside.

The writ petition challenged an award dated 16.10.2004 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, ...