Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1422 of 2024
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "written statement admission"
3467 result(s) found
Found 3467 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Appointment of Receiver. Court sets aside order appointing receiver for partnership firm M/s Sea Line Trading, holding that the trial court failed to consider the balance of convenience and the fact that the appellant was a partner in possession of the firm's assets.
8 Apr 2026The case involves a commercial appeal filed under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the CPC, challenging ...
- 110
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Appeal Challenging Reference Court's Compensation Award to Legal Heirs in Land Acquisition Dispute. The Appellate Court Examines Res Judicata Plea from Earlier Eviction Suit and the Applicability of Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
22 Jun 2017This first appeal arose from a dispute over the apportionment of compensation for an acquired house in Goa. The appellant, Shantabai L. Parkar, claime...
- 39
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Delayed Notice Beyond 30 Days Under Section 138 NI Act. Notice Posted on 31st Day from Bank Intimation Fails to Meet Mandatory Requirement of 'Giving Notice' Within 30 Days.
1 Oct 2024The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Shivnath Suryoba Gaonkar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...
- 956
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape and Kidnapping of Minor — Testimony of Prosecutrix Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence. The court held that the evidence of the prosecutrix alone is sufficient for conviction if found trustworthy, and minor inconsistencies do not discredit the prosecution case.
13 Jul 2023The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Wasim @ Mayabhai Solanki, challenging his conviction and sentence by the le...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Committee Order Rejecting Scheduled Tribe Claim for 'Raj' Community — Emphasizes Need for Proper Application of Mind and Consideration of All Evidence. The Court directed the Scrutiny Committee to reconsider the claim afresh, taking into account school records and affinity test report, under the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Act, 2000.
19 Mar 2015The petitioner, Sameer Ahmed Khan, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 11-6-2002 passed by the Commit...
- 137
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Advocate's Re-Enrollment After Surrender of Sanad During COVID-19. Karnataka Advocates' Welfare Fund Act, 1983 Does Not Bar Re-Entry; Right to Practice Under Article 19(1)(g) Upheld.
28 Jun 2024The petitioner, Shri Channabasappa Lingappa Mokhashi, enrolled as an advocate with the then Mysore Bar Council on 17-07-1973 and practiced continuousl...
- 168
High Court
Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute Between Siblings — Declares Plaintiff's Title and Possession Over Suit Property. Court holds that admission by plaintiff to give one house to defendant does not defeat his right to declaration and injunction, and that the First Appellate Court erred in modifying the decree without proper reasoning.
2 Jan 2025The case involves a property dispute between a brother (plaintiff) and his elder sister (defendant) over a suit property in Krishnagiri. The plaintiff...
- 55
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeals and Cross Objection in Specific Performance and Possession Dispute Over KHB Allotted House. Agreement Holder Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
19 Aug 2014The case involves a dispute over a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellan...
- 125
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appellant's Specific Performance Suit for Lack of Readiness and Willingness — Agreement Holder Not Entitled to Equitable Relief. Concurrent findings affirmed that appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
19 Aug 2014The dispute pertains to a house property allotted by the Karnataka Housing Board (KHB) to the respondent, Venkateshulu, in 1989. The appellant, Smt H ...
- 62
