Search Results for "substantial implementation"

1139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Acquisition Order Under MHADA Act Due to Non-Compliance and Delay. Land Acquisition Proposal Sanctioned in 2006 Set Aside as Authority Failed to Complete Acquisition Within Reasonable Period, Rendering the Order Unenforceable.

The petitioners, H.I.M.S. Botawala Charities (a public charitable trust) and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Challenging Charge Framing and Discharge in 1993 Mumbai Riot Case. Prima Facie Case Established for Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities.

The judgment pertains to two criminal revision applications filed by original accused nos. 32 and 76 in Sessions Case No. 930 of 2002, arising from C....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Disqualify Panchayat Member for Conflict of Interest Under Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 — Respondent Used Official Position to Obtain NOC for Spouse's Business, Violating Section 10(1)(h).

The petitioner, a resident and voter of Verla Canca village, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a declaration that re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Restrain Invocation of Bank Guarantee in Airport Development Contract Dispute. Court holds that bank guarantee is an independent contract and can be invoked only in case of breach, but no prima facie case of fraud or irretrievable injustice established.

The petitioner, Housing Development and Infrastructure Limited (HDIL), filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Co-opted Director in Bank Fraud Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Petitioner, a medical practitioner co-opted as director of a cooperative bank, was not named in charge-sheets and no material showed her involvement in alleged misappropriation.

The petitioner, a medical practitioner, was co-opted as a director of Samta Sahakari Bank Ltd., a cooperative society running banking business, from 1...