Search Results for "specific pleading"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "specific pleading"

1724 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1724 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows ESIC Appeal in Contribution Recovery Case — Limitation Period Under Section 77(1-A) of ESI Act Applies Only to Proceedings Before ESI Court, Not to Recovery Proceedings. The five-year limitation under proviso to Section 77(1-A)(b) does not bar the Corporation's claim for contribution for the period 1977-1996 when made before the ESI Court.

15 Jul 2015

The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) filed an appeal under Section 82 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, challenging the judgme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Cancellation of Recognition Under Section 13 of MRTU & PULP Act — Employer Has Locus to Seek Cancellation of Union Recognition. The Court held that Section 13 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 does not restrict the right to apply for cancellation of recognition to any particular category, and the employer, being a necessary party, can maintain such an application.

26 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Association of Engineering Workers, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, was granted recognition by the Industri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit by 'VOGUE' Magazine Owner Against 'JUST IN VOGUE' Retail Services. Well-Known Mark 'VOGUE' Protected Against Use for Dissimilar Services Under Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

19 Sep 2016

The Plaintiffs, Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc. and its subsidiary, are the proprietors and users of the trademark 'VOGUE' in respect of magazines a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Allowing Secondary Evidence of Will in Civil Suit. The court held that the trial court's discretion to allow secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 was not perverse and did not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.

16 Sep 2016

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit No.126/2006, challenged the order dated 20th July 2015 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Sen...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Allows Civil Revision Application, Rejects Plaint as Barred by Limitation and Without Cause of Action in Suit Challenging Sale Deed After Nine Years. The court held that a suit filed nine years after the execution of a sale deed is ex facie barred by limitation under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the plaint must be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

12 Jan 2026

The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, was filed by the applicant, Casme Industrial Park Devel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Claimant as Driver-cum-Owner Not Entitled to Compensation Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The court held that a claimant who is the driver-cum-owner of the offending vehicle cannot maintain a claim petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the provision is intended for third parties and not for the owner/driver of the vehicle involved in the accident.

23 Jan 2023

The present appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. challenging the judgment and award dated 11.09.2014 passed by the Principal Senior...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree Granting 1/3rd Share Each to Plaintiffs in Defendant's 1/6th Share. The Court held that the plaintiffs, being the wife and daughter of the first defendant, are entitled to a share in his separate property as per the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

15 Mar 2022

The appeal was filed by the defendants against the judgment and decree dated 09.10.2015 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Raibag, in O.S.No.9...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Sets Aside Appellate Decree for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. Failure to Frame Points for Determination and Provide Independent Reasoning Renders Appellate Judgment Unsustainable.

25 Nov 2022

The appellant (defendant) challenged the judgment of the II Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Dvn.) Hubballi in RA No.126/2004 dated 12.12.2006, which rever...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Property Dispute — High Court Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Decreeing Suit Based on Admission Without Trial. Order under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC set aside as admission must be clear, unambiguous, and not require interpretation.

1 Jan 2026

The present appeal arises from a family dispute over the sale proceeds of ancestral agricultural land. The respondent No.1 (plaintiff) filed a suit fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements Under Representation of the People Act, 1951. Failure to Furnish Attested Copies and Official Transcripts of CDs Renders Petition Liable for Summary Dismissal.

7 Mar 2017

The case involves an election petition filed by Adam Narsayya Narayan challenging the election of Praniti Shinde (Respondent No.1) from Solapur City C...

59 60 61 62 63

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)