Search Results for "section 23(3)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "section 23(3)"

889 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 889 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Counter Claim in Suit for Perpetual Injunction — Order 8 Rule 6A CPC Permits Set-Off or Counter Claim Even in Injunction Suits. The court held that a counter claim arising from the same transaction cannot be excluded with liberty to file a fresh suit, as it would lead to multiplicity of proceedings.

19 Jan 2015

The petitioners, who were defendants in Regular Civil Suit No. 561 of 2014, challenged an order passed by the trial court under Order 8 Rule 6A and 6C...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3(a) CPC Renders Injunction Invalid. The court held that the trial court's order issuing suit summons and notice on I.A.No.3 after the plaintiff failed to comply with Order XXXIX Rule 3(a) CPC within 30 days was unsustainable.

6 Jan 2017

The respondent/plaintiff, Mavalli Tiffin Rooms, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the appellant/defendant, HMS Host Services India Pvt. Lt...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition in Cooperative Bank Pension Dispute on Ground of Non-Maintainability Due to Prior Dismissal of SLP Against Same Judgment. The Bench held that when the main judgment had already been affirmed by dismissal of earlier SLP and the review petition was subsequently withdrawn with liberty to approach High Court, a fresh SLP challenging the same judgment was not maintainable.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute arose from a Himachal Pradesh High Court judgment directing a cooperative bank to grant pensionary benefits to its retired employees, whic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Additional Amenity TDR in Garden Reservation Case — Municipal Corporation Cannot Deny TDR for Land Reserved for Garden on Grounds of Non-Construction of Road. Held that once land is reserved for a garden and developed as such, the owner is entitled to additional amenity TDR under DCR 33(9) read with Section 126 of the MRTP Act, 1966, irrespective of whether a road is constructed.

3 Apr 2024

The petitioners, Vijay Nagar Apartments (a partnership firm) and its partner Dhaval Ajmera, owned approximately 98,369.1 square meters of land in Vill...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Anti-Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining Enforcement of Singapore Anti-Suit Order in NCLT Oppression and Mismanagement Dispute. Court holds that disputes under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 are non-arbitrable and exclusively triable by NCLT, and that an anti-suit injunction from a foreign court cannot be enforced in India to prevent a party from pursuing statutory remedies before the NCLT.

11 Sep 2023

The plaintiff, Anupam Mittal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking an anti-anti-suit injunction to restrain the defendants from enforcing an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish unlawful assembly and common object beyond reasonable doubt.

1 Dec 2015

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.482 of 2007 filed by original accused Nos.1 and 7 (Ravi Bhauraya Kolule and Siddhappa Bhima Lade) ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 307 IPC and Section 30 Arms Act set aside as medical and ballistic evidence contradicted the eyewitness account.

25 Jul 2016

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a judgment dated 29.12.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No.53...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

8 Jun 2022

The appellant, Smt. Kavitha, was convicted by the IV-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, in S.C.No.5051/2016 for the offence punishable...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case. Trial Court's Acquittal Upheld Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses Under Sections 307, 324, 504, 506(B) IPC.

18 Nov 2021

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Sections 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment of acquittal dated ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petitions in Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster Settlement Case, Upholding Original Agreement and Imposing Liability on Union of India for Compensation Deficiencies. The Court affirmed the 1989 settlement of US $470 million as just and reasonable under the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985, and reiterated the Union's obligation to cover any shortfalls per the 1991 Constitution Bench ruling.

14 Mar 2023

The judgment pertains to curative petitions filed by the Union of India seeking reconsideration of the settlement reached in the aftermath of the Bhop...

59 60 61 62 63

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)