Search Results for "regional commissioner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "regional commissioner"

1700 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1700 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by GPA Holder in Land Acquisition Case — No Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition Under KIAD Act. The Court held that a GPA holder cannot maintain a writ petition challenging land acquisition under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, as he has no independent right and the owner had already received compensation.

3 Dec 2025

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Jemcy Ponnappa C.P. and Casuba Infrastructure and Development Company against the State of Karnataka and othe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging PF Coverage for Establishment with 20 Employees Including Contractual Security Guards. Security guards engaged through agency are employees of the principal establishment for PF coverage under Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

5 Jul 2017

The petitioner, M/s Silicon Cortec, challenged the order dated 03.10.2005 passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner and the subsequent order...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Forfeiture of Rice and Release of Lorries Under Essential Commodities Act — Deputy Commissioner Exceeded Jurisdiction by Not Following Natural Justice. Order set aside for lack of notice and opportunity of hearing, remanded for fresh consideration.

3 Dec 2014

The petitioners, owners of lorries, challenged an order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Kolar District, under Sections 3 & 5 of th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal by Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Against Reduction of Damages; Upholds Tribunal's Appellate Power to Modify Quantum. The Court held that the Tribunal under Section 7L of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 has power to reduce damages imposed under Section 14B, and the parallel power of the Central Board under Paragraph 32B of the Scheme does not exclude the Tribunal's jurisdiction.

15 Dec 2010

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner imposed damages on the respondent employer for delayed contribution of provident fund dues for various period...

High Court

High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.

24 Feb 2026

The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workers' Appeal in Contract Labour Dispute — IPCA Laboratories Held Liable as Principal Employer Under Contract Labour Act. The court held that the Labour Enforcement Officer's complaint under Section 22A of the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 was maintainable and that the company was the principal employer, rejecting the company's challenge to the cognizance order.

23 Nov 2022

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals arising from a common order in Writ Petition No. 2791 of 2009. The appellants in LPA No. 270 of 2009 are ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Sugar Factory's Challenge Against EPF Appellate Tribunal Order on Damages Levy. Employer's Failure to Deposit Provident Fund Contributions Within Prescribed Time Attracts Damages Under Section 14B of Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, But Quantum Must Be Proportionate and Not Arbitrary.

6 Sep 2011

The petitioner, M/s Ashok Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar factory registered under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.

17 Oct 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...

High Court

High Court Dismisses PIL in Land Reservation Lapse Case Under MRTP Act Due to Automatic Statutory Lapse and Revised Development Plan. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi as Grievance Was Private Interest, and Municipal Council's Inaction After Purchase Notice Led to Deemed Lapse Under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, With New Plan Safeguarding Public Amenities.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute originated as a Public Interest Litigation filed in 2017 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging a...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Infancy Benefit Under Section 16(1)(b) of EPF Act — Hospital Established After Closure of Previous Unit Held Entitled to Infancy Exemption. The court held that the closure of the old hospital in 1989 and the subsequent establishment of a new hospital under a different trust with a new management structure constituted a new establishment under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.

27 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Manipal Goa Cancer & General Hospital, challenged two orders: (a) an order dated 18/06/2007 by the Assistant Provident Fund Commission...

59 60 61 62 63

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)