Search Results for "promotion orders"

2017 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2017 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Construction of Shopping Complex Within Prohibited Highway Area; Directions for Demolition Sought by Shirdi Councillors Based on Violation of Building Bye-Law and Lack of No-Objection Certificate.

The writ petition concerns a challenge to the construction of a shopping complex on land bearing survey no. 170/A2/1 abutting the Nagar-Manmad highway...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Allowing Liquor Licence in Village Where Women's Gramsabha Resolution Banned Liquor — Held That Gramsabha Resolution Under Section 138 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Must Be Given Due Weight and Cannot Be Ignored by Revisional Authority.

The petitioners, residents of Village Chas (kaman), Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Dismissal Order in Trap Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Irregularities. Petitioner Reinstated with Back Wages as Disciplinary Proceedings Based on Unsubstantiated Trap and Non-Examination of Key Witnesses Violated Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sri M.S. Kadkol, was a government employee who was dismissed from service based on a trap case. The trap was laid on a complaint dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Employee's Appeal Against Retrospective Reversion to Substantive Post Holding It Not Punishment. Reversion from Officiating Post Does Not Amount to Penal Consequence if No Forfeiture of Pay or Loss of Seniority; Belated Challenge to Seven-Year-Old Order Rightly Refused.

The case involved an appeal by a government servant against the judgment of the Judicial Commissioner's Court, Tripura, which had dismissed his writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5290 OF 2013

...