Search Results for "distribution company"

1483 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1483 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Electricity Bill Dispute — Sets Aside Lower Appellate Court's Judgment for Non-Compliance with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC. First appellate court must independently assess evidence and give reasons for reversal of trial court's findings.

The appellant, Sureshkumar S/o Rochiram Jagyasi, was a customer of the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (respondent) and operat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Judgment-Debtor in Electricity Dues Recovery Suit Due to Lack of Service of Summons. Decree Set Aside as Appellant Was Not Served Summons and Had No Opportunity to Defend, Violating Principles of Natural Justice.

The appellant, Shashikant s/o Eknath Choudhari, filed a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Discriminatory Designation of Employee as Lineman-cum-Meter Reader Instead of LDC/Meter Reader Violates MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) challenging an order of the Industrial ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Back Wages to Employee Acquitted in Corruption Case — Denial Must Be Reasoned. Reinstatement After Acquittal Does Not Automatically Entitle Back Wages; Employer Must Consider Nature of Acquittal and Conduct Under Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Bapusaheb Desai, was employed as a Junior Engineer with the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The Municipal Corporation of Amravati filed a criminal writ petition challenging the acquittal of the respondents in a case under the Prevention of Fo...