Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

3256 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3256 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Three Petitions Challenging Invalidity of Thakur Scheduled Tribe Certificates — Remands for Fresh Consideration Due to Procedural Irregularities. The Court Held That Scrutiny Committees Must Conduct Proper Vigilance Cell Inquiries and Apply Mind to All Evidence, Including School Records, Before Rejecting Caste Claims.

26 Feb 2014

The Bombay High Court disposed of three writ petitions challenging orders of the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committees that invalidate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Purchaser's Appeal and Upholds High Court's Decision Allowing Redemption Under SARFAESI Act Due to Non-Completion of Sale by Registration. Right of Redemption Under Section 13(8) SARFAESI Act Survives Until Registered Sale Deed, Following Principles of Section 60 Transfer of Property Act.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The dispute arose from the sale of a secured asset under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Secu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case: Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for facade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, or use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, M/s Alupuro Building Systems Pvt. Ltd., is a construction contractor that imports pre-coated Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and under...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Murder and Robbery; Multiple FIRs and Circumstantial Evidence Examined. Appellants Challenged Sessions Case No.50/2009 Conviction Under Sections 302, 365, 394, 201 r/w 120-B IPC, Raising Issues of Double Jeopardy and Incomplete Chain of Circumstances.

8 Feb 2019

These four criminal appeals arose from a common judgment and order of the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Panaji, in Sessions Case No.50/2009, convicting t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

30 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Abduction, Murder, Robbery, and Conspiracy. The Appellants Contended That Lodging Two FIRs for the Same Transaction Vitiated the Trial and That Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

8 Feb 2019

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 50/2009, which convic...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Bhima Koregaon-Elgar Parishad Case Under UAP Act. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 and Entitles Accused to Bail Despite Section 43D(5) Bar.

19 Sep 2022

The appellant, Hany Babu, a professor and academic, was arrested on 28 July 2020 in connection with FIR No. 1 of 2020 registered by the National Inves...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order in Execution Proceedings; Permits Power of Attorney Holder to Argue. Execution of Decree for Possession in Specific Performance Suit Involves Third Party Rights.

7 Oct 2005

This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXI Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenged the order of a learned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Allowing Liquor Licence in Village Where Women's Gramsabha Resolution Banned Liquor — Held That Gramsabha Resolution Under Section 138 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Must Be Given Due Weight and Cannot Be Ignored by Revisional Authority.

30 Aug 2012

The petitioners, residents of Village Chas (kaman), Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

59 60 61 62 63

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)