Search Results for "Article 227 CPC"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Promotion in Cooperative Bank, Reverses High C...
Supreme Court Grants Leave and Examines High Court's Interpretation of Section 3...

Search Results for "Article 227 CPC"

868 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 868 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Against Dismissal of Commissioner Appointment in Partition Suit — Failure to Consider Application on Merits. Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC Requires Application of Mind and Recording of Reasons Before Dismissing Application for Appointment of Advocate Commissioner.

24 Feb 2026

The petitioner, N. Nithyanandan, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated January 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition and Second Appeal in Land Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact by Lower Courts. The court held that the petitioners failed to establish any substantial question of law or jurisdictional error warranting interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

14 Aug 2019

The case involves a land dispute where the original plaintiff (Mohd. Ayyub Mohd. Bashir and others) filed a suit for declaration of ownership and inju...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Order in Mundkar Dispute — Tribunal Exceeded Revisionary Jurisdiction Under Section 26 of Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975. Concurrent Findings of Fact by Mamlatdar and Collector Cannot Be Reversed Without Perversity.

9 Oct 2018

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original petitioner Mrs. Antoneta Fernandes, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Trial Court's Order Framing Preliminary Issue on Maintainability in Specific Performance Suit — Section 16 of Specific Relief Act Cannot Be Decided as Preliminary Issue Without Evidence. The issue of maintainability under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, is a mixed question of law and fact and cannot be tried as a preliminary issue under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC.

4 Apr 2018

The Bombay High Court was hearing two writ petitions filed by M/s. Skyline Construction, a partnership firm, challenging an order dated 13th November ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Summons to Arbitrator in Section 34 Proceedings — Arbitrator Not a Necessary Party Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Arbitrator cannot be arrayed as defendant in arbitration suit challenging award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Sri H.N.M. Prasad, a practicing advocate, acted as an arbitrator and passed an arbitral award on 10.3.2015 in a dispute between Smt. V...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Temporary Injunction in Tenancy Dispute — Status Quo Order Vacated. Court holds that petitioners failed to establish prima facie case and balance of convenience for injunction, as they were not in exclusive possession of suit land and tenancy proceedings were pending.

24 Sep 2014

The petitioners, Kisan Radhaji Gajare and Govind Radhaji Gajare, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of temporary injunction by the trial co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entry Based on Will in Land Revenue Case — Civil Court Decree Binding on Revenue Authorities. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 227 Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence.

6 Jun 2011

The petitioners, Amrutrao Shankarrao Deshmukh and Dhananjay Amrutrao Deshmukh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Employee in Coal India Service Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as No Inquiry Held Before Dismissal Based on Self-Declaration. Rule 34(1)(ii) of Coal India Executives Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rules, 1978 Requires Inquiry Before Penalty of Removal.

5 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Shri Sheopurari Singh, was employed as Deputy General Manager (Vigilance) in M-1 Grade at the Vigilance Department of Western Coalfiel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Treatment of Reply as Written Statement in CPC Case — No Prejudice as Reply Filed Within 90 Days and Verified. Order VIII Rule 1 CPC is directory; treating a timely filed and verified reply to an injunction application as written statement does not cause prejudice to the plaintiffs.

9 Feb 2010

The petitioners, original plaintiffs in a civil suit, challenged an order of the trial court dated 30 January 2010. By that order, the trial court acc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Defendant to Produce Documents in Specific Performance Suit — Liberal Approach to Production of Documents Under CPC. Trial Court's Rejection of Application for Production of Documents Set Aside as Premature and Contrary to Law.

20 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Mrs. Ivy Muriet Fonseca, was the defendant in Special Civil Suit No.85/2001/C filed by the respondent, Mr. Porus Adi Doctor, for speci...

59 60 61 62 63

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)