Search Results for "tenancy claims"

857 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 857 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Tenant Eviction Case — Bonafide Requirement and Lapse of Lease Term Upheld. The concurrent findings of fact by the trial court and appellate court were not shown to be perverse or illegal, and the revision was dismissed.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendant (tenant) against the respondent (original plaintiff/landlord) challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

“Mandatory Injunction vs Possession: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 41(h) Specific Relief Act (2026 INSC 61)”“Cloud on Title & Possession: Why Injunction Suit Fails

In Sanjay Paliwal v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., the plaintiffs sought a mandatory injunction to remove a wall allegedly blocking access to their l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Petitioners Challenging Competent Authority's Orders Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 -- Petitioners Fail to Establish Jurisdictional Error or Violation of Natural Justice

The judgment involves four connected writ petitions filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging orders passed by the Competent Aut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Occupancy Certificate Proceedings. Land Tribunal's order set aside as it was passed without notice to petitioners and without considering their objections under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who are agriculturists, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence After Plaintiff's Side Closed. Court Held That Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Evidence or to Remedy Negligence of Party.

The petitioner, Sri P. Ramaprasad, was the plaintiff in O.S. No. 231/2019 pending before the XIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore C...