Search Results for "temporary injunction"

1638 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1638 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Interim Order — No Willful Disobedience Established as Accused Complied with Order to Restore Water Connection Within Time Granted.

The complainant, Kishin T. Panjabi, filed a contempt petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Injunction Order in Pledge Dispute, Upholds Ad-Interim Relief Despite Delay in Pronouncement. Delay of Over One Year in Passing Interlocutory Order Does Not Automatically Vitiate It Unless Prejudice Is Demonstrated.

The case involves three commercial appeals filed under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging an order dated 5 June 2023 pass...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Section 6 Specific Relief Act Suit — High Court's Revision Under Section 115 CPC Set Aside for Exceeding Jurisdiction. Revisional Power Cannot Be Used to Correct Errors of Fact or Law in Interlocutory Orders.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by Respondent No.1 (Shashi Verma) under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking declaration of w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Appeal, Upholds Injunction Against Demolition Without Due Process. Municipal Corporation Cannot Demolish Premises Without Following Procedure Under Section 478 of Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.

The appellant, Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation, was the original defendant in a suit filed by the respondent, Tukaram Muttappa Pai, who had purc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Injunction in Development Agreement Dispute. Court holds that plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case and balance of convenience for injunction restraining defendant from dealing with property.

The appellant, M/s Gandhi Builders & Developers, filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 26-11-2007 with the predecesso...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Holds That Payments Made to Authorized Representatives of Partnership Firm Are Valid Under Contract Act. Burden of Proof Shifts to Defendants When Plaintiff Proves Payment to Persons Held Out as Authorized in Brochure.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Mr. Sharad Prabhudas, against the judgment of the First Appellate Court which rever...