Search Results for "omissions not proved"

1484 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1484 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and lacked corroboration.

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, for the murder of Santu Jayram Ranmale and o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Well Disposal Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Sustain Life Imprisonment Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellants, Gautam Kamlakar Pardeshi and Rahul @ Lalya Yogesh Jadhav, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, for the murder of an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Attempt to Rape of Minor Girl — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Incriminating Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 302 and Section 376 read with Section 511 IPC.

The appellant, Vasant Jaiwant Palande, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of a 15-year-old girl (Chhoti @ Sujata @ Sulochana) and for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Unlawful Assembly and Common Object.

The case involves multiple appeals against conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 400 of 2004. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and In-laws for Dowry Death and Murder of Married Woman. Evidence of Cruelty and Demand for Gold Chain Establishes Offence Under Section 304B IPC.

The case involves the death of Sou. Laxmi, wife of appellant Anil Appaseheb Nulle (A1) and daughter-in-law of appellants Appaseheb Krishnarao Nulle (A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal of Convicted Accused in Assault Case, Dismisses State Appeals for Acquittal and Enhancement. Conviction under Section 324 r/w 34 IPC for causing simple hurt with dangerous weapon upheld, but sentence reduced to period already undergone.

The judgment arises from three appeals concerning an incident that occurred on 15th August 1999 at Loni Kalbhor, Pune. The appellants (original accuse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as victim's evidence found untrustworthy and medical evidence inconclusive.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Kishore Vitthalrao Shendre for offences under Sections 376(2)(i) and 452 of the Indian Penal Cod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Housing Loan Disbursement — No Privity of Contract Between Complainant and Bank. Complainant Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as No Service Was Hired or Availed from the Appellant Bank.

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondent (original complainant) against the appellant bank before the National Cons...