Search Results for "employment termination"

1723 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1723 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Training Under Industrial Disputes Act — Trainee Not a Workman Under Section 2(s) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Training Agreement Did Not Create Employer-Employee Relationship, Hence No Retrenchment.

The petitioner, Nilesh Shivaji Sapkar, was initially appointed by respondent no.4, Volkswagen India Private Limited, for a fixed period of six months ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Tribunal Rejecting Plea for Award on Majority Settlement. Industrial Tribunal Found Majority Settlement Voluntary but Held It Not Binding on Non-Signatory Union Members Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The management of Caterpillar India Private Limited, a multinational manufacturing off-road vehicles, and its recognized union, Caterpillar India Priv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petition in Minimum Wages Act Dispute Over Reimbursement of Labour Costs. Contractor Seeks Revision of Contract Rates After Notification Increased Minimum Wages for Sweeping and Cleaning Employment.

Background: The petitioner, A2Z Infraservices Limited, a company engaged in providing mechanized cleaning and housekeeping services, entered into thre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiffs' Suit for License Fee and Compensation, Allows Defendant's Counter-Claim for Losses Due to Suppression of No Development Zone Status. Plaintiffs held liable for fraudulent misrepresentation regarding land use, entitling Defendant to damages for demolished tower.

The plaintiffs, owners of a larger property in Madh, Malad, Mumbai, entered into a leave and license agreement with the defendant, a telecom company, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service Under Rule 23 of LIC Pension Rules, 1995, and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC Appeal, Denies Pension to Resigned Employee Under Retrospective Pension Rules. Resignation Forfeits Past Service and Cannot Be Equated with Voluntary Retirement Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), United India Insurance Company ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows LIC's Appeal Against Resigned Employee's Pension Claim — Resignation Not Voluntary Retirement Under Pension Rules. Employee Who Resigned Before Pension Scheme Notification Not Entitled to Retrospective Benefits Under LIC Pension Rules, 1995.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning employees of the Life Insurance Corporation of India, United India Insurance Company Limite...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Workman's Petition in Industrial Dispute Challenging Termination and Denial of Back Wages. Termination Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Full Back Wages Granted as Employer Failed to Prove Gainful Employment.

The petitioner, a workman employed by the Union of India through the Controller of Quality Assurance (Vehicles), Ministry of Defence, challenged his t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Termination of Employee Based on Conviction Despite Pending Appeal. Conviction Itself Is Sufficient Reasoning Under Rule 10(a) of Maharashtra State Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations, and Suspension of Sentence Does Not Invalidate Termination.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., challenged the orders of the courts below which directed the respondent, Pundalik...