Search Results for "commercial arbitration petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "commercial arbitration petition"

1265 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1265 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Majority Arbitral Award in Share Subscription Dispute — Put Option and Performance Clause Enforceable Despite Foreign Investment Regulations. The court dismissed a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the award did not contravene FEMA or SEBI regulations and was not against public policy.

11 Dec 2018

This judgment by the Bombay High Court deals with two connected arbitration petitions arising from a share subscription and shareholders agreement dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Arbitral Award in Cotton Supply Disputes — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on contractual terms and CAI byelaws, rejecting challenges on merits and procedural irregularities.

17 Feb 2016

The case involves three appeals filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by M/s. Subramanya Cotton Ginning Industries, M/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Exclusion of 1854 Days for Filing Challenge to MSME Award Due to Bona Fide Prosecution in Wrong Forum and COVID-19. Period from 5 April 2017 to 1 November 2022 excluded under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Dec 2023

The applicant, Bharat Electronics Limited, filed an Interim Application seeking exclusion of 1854 days from 5 April 2017 to 1 November 2022 for comput...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Termination of Contract. Court holds that existence of disputes and arbitration agreement is sufficient for appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, even if the underlying contract is terminated.

30 Nov 2023

The appellant, Madgavkar Salvage, a partnership firm, filed an appeal against the order of the Commercial Court rejecting its application under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Share Delivery — Respondent's Opposition on Grounds of Hardship Not Sustained. Court Permits Withdrawal Without Prejudice to Respondent's Rights Under the Award and Pending Proceedings.

15 Jul 2016

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of a Single Judge dated 2 February...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by MP Power Management Company, Upholds Termination of Power Purchase Agreement for Non-Compliance of Conditions Subsequent. The Court held that the High Court erred in interfering with a non-statutory contract and that the termination was justified as the seller failed to fulfill conditions within the extended period.

1 Jan 2022

The appellant, M.P. Power Management Company Limited, a wholly owned government company responsible for bulk purchase of electricity in Madhya Pradesh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Licensor in Eviction Dispute Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — License Held for Residential Purpose. The court restored the eviction order of the Competent Authority, holding that the license was for residential purpose and the Competent Authority had jurisdiction under Section 24 of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

12 Nov 2024

The Petitioner, Deepak S. Kavadiya, is the owner of Flat No. A/1102, Juhu Griha Swapna CHSL, JVPD, Juhu, Vile Parle West, Mumbai-400056. Respondent No...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

4 Dec 2017

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

7 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

58 59 60 61 62

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)