Search Results for "carry forward and set off"

600 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 600 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under Customs Act — Directs Release on Conditions. Joint Commissioner's order set aside as not considering Section 110A of Customs Act, 1962; goods to be released on bank guarantee and bond.

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by Himgiri Buildcon & Industries Limited and Agsons Agencies (I) Private Limited against th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Medical College's Appeal Against Reinstatement of Non-Medical Teachers in University Affiliation Dispute. Qualifications of Lecturers with M.Sc. and Ph.D. in Basic Sciences Held Valid Under MCI Regulations for Appointment in Pre-Clinical Departments.

The case involves appeals by K.J. Somaiya Medical College and Research Centre against a common judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 17th April 2007...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Ground Not Raised by Petitioner. Court holds that a party cannot challenge an arbitral award on a ground that only aggrieves the opposite party, who has not challenged the award.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge on a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Forest Watchman but Modifies Back Wages in Labour Dispute. Daily-rated employee's termination set aside for violation of Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The State of Maharashtra and the Divisional Forest Officer filed a writ petition challenging the Labour Court's award dated 30/09/2002 in Ref.(IDA) No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Electricity Regulatory Dispute Over Coal Procurement Compensation. The Court upheld the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity's methodology for calculating compensation for coal shortfall, finding it consistent with established precedents under the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal challenging an order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity dated November 13, 2020. The Tribunal had set ...