Search Results for "advance purchase"

1263 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1263 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Disputed Liability. Complainant failed to prove legally enforceable debt as accused raised probable defence of cash payment for goods not supplied under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Sheshrao Krishnarao Umredkar, proprietor of M/s Rakesh Enterprises, filed a criminal appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 29...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition for Lack of Bona Fides and Substantial Defence. Company's claim of disputed debt and pending civil suit found to be a bona fide defence against winding up under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, M/s. Joshi Bullion Gems & Jewellery Pvt. Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Challenge to Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

This batch of writ petitions arises from a common dispute between the Maharashtra State Handloom Corporation (the Corporation) and its employees. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Partner's Challenge to Prosecution Under Section 138 NI Act Without Joining Firm. Partnership Firm Not a Separate Legal Entity; Partner Can Be Prosecuted Individually for Cheque Dishonour.

The case involves four criminal writ petitions filed by the petitioner, Philip J., challenging the order dated 23 July 2013 passed by the Additional S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused. The court restored conviction under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of two cheques of Rs.1 lakh each.

The appellant, M/s Radhesham Laxminarayan and Co., a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Agreement to Sell Not a Deemed Conveyance Without Transfer of Possession | Tenant’s Possession Not Sufficient | Supreme Court (2026 INSC 59)

The Supreme Court allowed the civil appeal filed by Vayyaeti Srinivasarao and set aside the judgment of the High Court, which had affirmed the Trial C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Decree for Specific Performance in Agreement to Sell Dispute Involving Agricultural Land. Court Applies Doctrine of Lis Pendens to Transfers Made During Litigation and Affirms Plaintiff's Readiness and Willingness Based on Documentary Evidence.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 18.07.1988, where the plaintiff agreed to purchase agricultural la...