Search Results for "Temporary Statute"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Temporary Statute"

1150 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1150 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement Case — Defendant's Plastic Container Found Deceptively Similar to Plaintiff's Registered Design Under Designs Act, 2000. The court applied the 'eye test' and held that the overall impression of the Defendant's product was identical to the Plaintiff's registered design, despite minor differences in colour.

1 Jul 2016

The Plaintiffs, Selvel Industries and Sears Industries, filed a suit for infringement and passing off under the Designs Act, 2000, against the Defenda...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Upholds Award for Death of Boiler Attendant in Course of Employment. The court affirmed that interest under Section 4A(3) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 is payable from the date of accident, not from the date of award.

10 Nov 2020

The appeal was filed by the employer, the Managing Director of Bengaluru Urban & Rural District Co-operative Milk Producers' Societies Union Ltd., und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice for Cancellation of Freedom Fighter Land Grant; Upholds State's Inherent Power to Investigate Fraud. Fraud Vitiates Everything and No Estoppel Arises Against the State; Show Cause Notice and Reference to Lokayukta Under Section 7(2-A) of the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Are Not Interfered With.

13 Oct 2017

The High Court of Karnataka adjudicated a writ petition filed by Sri S. Sundaresh, son of a deceased freedom fighter, challenging a show cause notice ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Criminal Revision Petitions Challenging Rejection of Default Bail and Cognizance in NDPS Case. Court’s Analysis Focuses on Maintainability Under Section 397 CrPC and Application of Precedents.

24 May 2021

The judgment of the High Court of Karnataka arises from two criminal revision petitions filed by the accused No.3, challenging the orders of the Speci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares MSRTC Circular Denying Alternative Employment to Colour-Blind Drivers as Ultra Vires Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Clause 11 of the impugned circular treating intervening period as leave without pay held contrary to Section 20 of the 2016 Act, which mandates protection of pay and service conditions.

16 Jul 2020

The matter involved fourteen writ petitions filed by drivers employed with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC). The petitioners w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CBFC Cuts Imposed on Film on Drug Addiction; Holds Pre-Censorship Must Conform to Article 19(2) Reasonable Restrictions. State's Decision to Delete References to Punjab and Mutilate Content Violates Freedom of Speech Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution.

13 Jun 2016

The first petitioner, a film production company, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the decision of the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Application to Vacate Ex Parte Ad Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit. Allegations of Suppression of Material Facts Including Limitation of Registration in Class 25 and Prior User Evidence Are Examined.

15 Oct 2025

The dispute arose from a Commercial Suit for trade mark infringement and passing off filed by Shoban Salim Thakur, sole proprietor of M/s. Family Foot...

58 59 60 61 62

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)