Search Results for "Potential Value"

1048 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1048 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal Reducing Land Acquisition Compensation from Rs. 2,00,000 to Rs. 1,00,000 per Acre for Lack of Evidence. Claimants failed to prove market value through sale instances or other evidence under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Executive Engineer, Medium Project Division, Latur, against the judgment of the Reference Court enhancing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal for Enhancement of Land Acquisition Compensation — Appellants Failed to Prove Market Value. Land Acquisition Officer's Award of Rs.23 per sq m Upheld Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, Shivanand Vassudeva Salgaocar and Dattaraj Vassudeva Salgaocar, owned land surveyed under no.219/2 in Village Sancoale, admeasuring 52...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement. Compensation for playground land enhanced from Rs.30 to Rs.102 per sqm based on comparable sales and location advantages under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Village Panchayat of Collem, challenged the judgment and award dated 13.01.2010 passed by the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal by Development Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Reduced from Rs.1,50,000 to Rs.1,20,000 per Acre. Comparable Sale Deed Method Upheld but Deduction for Development Reduced from 40% to 20% Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves an appeal by the Bijapur Urban Development Authority (BUDA) against the judgment of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bijapur, i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assessment of Profit from Land Transaction as Adventure in Nature of Trade. Single Transaction of Purchase and Subdivision of Estate into Plots with Resale Held to Constitute Business Profit Under Section 34(1)(a) of Income-tax Act, 1922.

The assessee, P. M. Mohammad Meerakhan, entered into an agreement on 15th August 1955 to purchase 477.71 acres of land called Kuttikal Estate for Rs. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal Against Review of Concurrent Findings in Forest Land Dispute Under Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967. High Court Exceeded Review Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Concurrent Findings of Fact.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Telangana against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, which had revi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...