Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"

680 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 680 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision and Writ Petitions in Property Dispute, Upholding Appointment of Court Receiver. Court holds that disputes regarding title and possession cannot be decided in summary proceedings and that appointment of receiver is a discretionary remedy to preserve property.

The judgment arises from a property dispute concerning a piece of land in Mumbai. The original plaintiff, Amedmal Bhatewada (since deceased), filed a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Municipal Corporation to Consider Regularization Applications Before Demolition in Mall Mezzanine Case. Occupants of Mall Entitled to Submit Regularization Application Under Section 53(3) of MRTP Act Due to Delayed Action by Corporation.

The petitioners, occupants of a mall called 'Dreams the Mall' in Bhandup-West, challenged a notice issued under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Lease of Manjeetnagar Garden Space to Private Sports Club. Petition Alleges Illegal Diversion of Recreational Open Space Under Development Control Rules and Building Bye-Laws

The writ petition challenged an agreement dated 30.3.1998 between the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation and the Icon National Sports Club, leasing a 26...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Trial Court's Order Impleading Third Parties in Civil Suit Challenging Demolition Notices Under MRTP Act. Court Holds That Third Parties Having Direct Interest in Suit Property and Being Affected by Decision Are Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the petitioners before the 4th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane, challenging three notices issue...